शिक्षक संघ ने समस्याओं पर किया विचार

कैथल(ब्यूरो)। राजकीय प्राथमिक शिक्षक संघ की जिला कार्यकारिणी की बैठक जिला प्रधान रोशन लाल पंवार की अध्यक्षता में संपन्न हुई। बैठक में प्राथमिक शिक्षकों के सामने आ रही समस्याओं पर विचार किया गया। पंवार ने कहा कि शैक्षणिक सत्र के पांच माह बीतने के बाद भी स्कूलों में पुस्तकें न पहुंचाना सरकार की शिक्षा के प्रति लापरवाही स्पष्ट करती है। जिला स्तर पर प्राथमिक शिक्षकों को कन्फर्म करने, वरिष्ठता सूची बनाने, मुख्यशिक्षक, हिंदी, संस्कृत और पंजाबी अध्यापक पदों पर पदोन्नति की मांग अधूरी है। इनके कारण अध्यापकों में रोष व्याप्त है। जिला वरिष्ठ उपप्रधान राजेश बैनीवाल ने कहा कि संघ के संघर्ष के कारण ही रेशनलाइजेशन में अध्यापकों को मनपंसद स्कूल अलाट किए गए हैं। जिला प्रधान ने कहा कि संगठन को मजबूत करने के लिए और अध्यापकों को शिक्षा का अधिकार कानून से अवगत करवाने के लिए सभी खंडों में एक दिवसीय सेमिनार आयोजित किए जाएंगे। इस अवसर पर जिला संयोजक जोगेन्द्र राणा, कोषाध्यक्ष मनोज नैन, उपप्रधान शमशेर कालिया, जसमहिन्द्र चहल, कैथल प्रधान बलवान छौत, गुहला प्रधान कुलदीप नैन, सीवन प्रधान सूरजभान, राजबीर कौल, मनरूप वजीरखेड़ा, सत्य नारायण दुमाड़ा, पंकज कौशिक, जगजीत फौजी, विकास गुप्ता, श्याम सिंह सीड़ा, नरेश कालिया, अशोक धीमान, सतीश फ्रांसवाला, मुल्तान सिंह ढांडे, सुरेन्द्र धानिया, अशोक वर्मा और अनिल बूरा उपस्थित रहे।

local holidays in kaithal 2013

अब स्कूल में रात बिताएंगे शिक्षा महानिदेशक 

अब स्कूल में रात बिताएंगे शिक्षा महानिदेशक 

अम्बाला सिटी त्न कैथल में डीसी के पद पर रहते हुए गांवों में रात्रि ठहराव के सफल कार्यक्रम के बाद अब 

सेकेंडरी शिक्षा महानिदेशक चंद्रशेखर कर्मचारियों एवं स्कूली बच्चों के अभिभावकों की समस्याओं का 

समाधान खुद उनके पास आकर करने की तैयारी में हैं। महानिदेशक चंद्रशेखर अपनी टीम के साथ दोपहर 

में खंड शिक्षा कार्यालय और रात को स्कूलों में ठहराव करेंगे। योजना 23 अगस्त से कुरुक्षेत्र के लाडवा खंड 

में राजकीय सीनियर सेकेंडरी स्कूल बदौंदा से शुरू की जाएगी। 

इस बात की पुष्टि हरियाणा स्कूल एजुकेशन ऑफिसर एसोसिएशन के प्रांतीय संरक्षक सुधीर कालड़ा और 

अध्यक्ष महेंद्र सिंह चौहान ने की है। शिक्षा सदन पंचकूला में एसोसिएशन और महानिदेशक के बीच हुई 

सात अगस्त की बैठक में योजना का पारूप तैयार किया गया। सात महीने में प्रदेश के हर जिले से एक 

खंड शिक्षा कार्यालय का दौरा अवश्य किया जाएगा।

प्रत्येक माह के पहले, तीसरे और चौथे शुक्रवार को यह कार्यक्रम खंड शिक्षा कार्यालय पर शुरू होगा।

किसी भी जिले के एक खंड का चयन करने के बाद शुक्रवार दोपहर बाद महानिदेशक अपनी टीम के साथ 

खंड शिक्षा कार्यालय में पधारेंगे। कर्मचारियों, प्रिंसिपलों और अध्यापकों की समस्याएं सुनी जाएगी और 

लंबित पड़े मामलों का मौके पर ही निपटान किया जाएगा। शाम को मोटिवेशन सेक्शन में स्कूल मुखिया 

और प्रिंसिपल को प्रेरक प्रसंग फिल्में दिखाकर कर्तव्यों के प्रति प्रेरित किया जाएगा। इसके बाद 

महानिदेशक खंड के ही किसी स्कूल में रात्रि ठहराव के लिए प्रस्थान करेंगे। यहां पर बच्चों के अभिभावक, 

ग्राम पंचायत और एसएमसी के साथ बैठक करके शिकायतों का समाधान करेंगे। अगले दिन शनिवार को 

उसी विद्यालय की प्रार्थना सभा में शामिल होकर बच्चों से रूबरू होकर दो घंटे तक विद्यालय की कार्य 

प्रणाली का निरीक्षण करेंगे।

ABOUT MID DAY MEAL COOKS

 ABOUT CONFERMATION OF GOVT EMPLOYEES

REVIEW DECISION OF HIGH COURT ABOUT PROMOTION OF JBT TRS JOIN IN 2000 IN ROSHAN LAL V/S STATE OF HARYANA

ROSHAN LAL V/S STATE OF HARYANA CWP 23173/2010

DECISION OF CASE RELATED 2000 JOIN JBT TEACHERS ABOUT THE PROMOTION 
THE REVIEW PETITION FILED BY GOVT. OF HARYANA DISMISSED BY HON'BLE PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT CHANDIGARH.
C.M.NO.7927/2013 
IN REVIEW APPLICATION NO. 198/2013 IN 
Civil writ petition no 23173/2010......
ROSHAN LAL and others vs State of haryana and others

Present Mr.Deepak Jindal,D.A G,Haryana for the review application/respondent
R.A.NO.198/2013
No ground for review of the oder dated 27/9/2012 is made out 
Application stands Dismissed
.....
C.M.No. 7927/2013 
Inthe light of the dismissal of thereview applicaation,ther is no necessity to pass any order on the application for condonation of delay 
Cm stands disposed of accordingly 
And this court order pass 
Civil Writ Petition under article 226/227 of the constitution of India for the issuance of a writ in the nature of Mandamus directing the respondents to promote the petitioners on the post of i.e, S.S.Master, Science Master,or Math Master as per their eligibity w.e.f. the date their
Juniors were promoted and with all the consequential benefits of Pay, Salary Seniority,And other benefits including the arrears of salaryarising therefrom and for issuance of any other writ order or direction as deemed fit by this court the facts and circumstances of the case.


Full decision about promotion of jbt trs join in 2000 decided on 27/09/2012
C.W.P.No.23173 of 2010 -1-
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANAAT 
CHANDIGARH
Date of Decision:- 27.09.2012
C.W.P.No.23173 of 2010
Roshan Lal and others ....Petitioner(s)
vs.
State of Haryana and others ....Respondent(s)
C.W.P.No.2377 of 2011
Satyawan and others ....Petitioner(s)
vs.
State of Haryana and others ....Respondent(s)
***
CORAM:- HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE AUGUSTINE GEORGE MASIH
***
Present:- Mr.Rajbir Sehrawat, Advocate,
for the petitioners in CWP No.23173 of 2010.
Mr.C.R.Dahiya, Advocate,
for the petitioners in CWP No.2377 of 2011.
Mr.Harish Rathee, Sr.D.A.G., Haryana.
***
AUGUSTINE GEORGE MASIH, J. (Oral)
By this order, I propose to dispose of two writ petitions i.e.
C.W.P.No.23173 of 2010 and C.W.P.No.2377 of 2011 as common questions
of facts and law are involved therein.
For the sake of convenience, facts are being taken from CWP
No.23173 of 2010.C.W.P.No.23173 of 2010 -2-
Petitioners have approached this Court asserting that they were
appointed as JBT Teachers in pursuance to the selection made in the year2000 and that the JBT Teachers who were appointed in the subsequentbatches in pursuance to the selection held in the years 2001 and 2004, havealready been promoted to the posts of Masters/Mistresses according to thestatutory Rules. Petitioners have been denied the said benefit only on theground that their selection is under challenge before the Supreme Court andthe matter has been entrusted by the Supreme Court to the Central Bureau ofInvestigation (for short 'CBI') for determining the genuineness of the twolists, which are purported to be available on record, as to which one shouldbe given effect to. This, counsel for the petitioners, contends cannot bemade a ground for not considering the claim of the petitioners for promotion
especially when till date the petitioners formed the cadre of JBT Teachers,They are continuing as such. He places reliance upon the order passed bythis Court in CWP No.10970 of 2009 Anil Kumar and others vs. State ofHaryana and others, decided on 10.11.2010 (Annexure P-6) and prays forissuance of the same directions.
Counsel for the respondents, on the other hand, contends that
the claim as made by the petitioners in the present writ petitioncannot beaccepted in the light of the observations made by the Supreme Court in theselection of JBT Teachers of the year 2000 which is pending before it. Hecontends that it has been observed by the Supreme Court in its order whileentrusting the investigation to the CBI that on the result of the enquiry
would depend the fate of these two sets of persons. It is only one set ofpersons which would be found to be genuine and hence entitled to hold theC.W.P.No.23173 of 2010 -3-
posts of teachers and the persons from list, if found to be false, shall have tomake room for the others. He, on this basis, contends that the claim of thepetitioners for promotion cannot be granted. Accordingly, he prays forDismissal of the writ petitions.
I have considered the submissions made by the counsel for the
parties and with their assistance have gone through the records of the case.As is apparent from the assertions made by the counsel for theparties, petitioners belong to the 2000 Batch of selected JBT Teachers.They are serving with the respondents since the date of their appointment.Subsequent to the selection and appointment of the petitioners, selection ofJBT Teachers has been made in the years 2001 and 2004, of which selectedand appointed candidates, have already been given promotion on the postsof Masters/Mistresses. Petitioners are being denied promotion merelyonthe ground that the matter pertaining to their selection is under challengeand pending consideration before the Supreme Court wherein a CBI enquiryhas been marked. Nothing has been placed on record which would entitlethe respondents for non-consideration of the claim of the petitioners forpromotion. That apart, whether the list from which the petitioners havebeen appointed or the other list is a genuine list, has to be determined andatthis stage, it cannot be said that the petitioners have been selected wronglyand there is nothing on record which would suggest that their appointmentand selection are not in consonance with law as of now.In the light of the above and taking these aspects intoconsideration, this Court in Anil Kumar's case (supra) had disposed of thewrit petition with a direction to the respondent-State to consider the case ofC.W.P.No.23173 of 2010 -4-the petitioners for promotion in terms of the eligibility criteria laiddown
within a period of four months from the date of receipt of certified copy ofthe order. The stand of the respondents in the present writ petition alsocannot be accepted for non-consideration of the claim of the petitioners.Taking into consideration the facts and circumstances, thepresent writ petitions are disposed of with directions to the respondents toconsider the claim of the petitioners for promotion to the posts ofMasters/Mistresses in accordance with law, within a period of four monthsfrom the date of receipt of certified copy of this order.
September 27, 2012 ( AUGUSTINE GEORGE MASIH )
poonam JUDGE